Comparing Mazda CX-5 with other crossovers

If you are looking for a good family car, you should know that Mazda CX-5, Honda CR-V, and Subaru Crosstrek are the popular options among the compact family crossover models. However, if you are looking for a compact sedan, Chevy Cruze and Mazda 3 may be good options.

Compact family crossover
The 2017 Mazda CX-5 is a good car to consider in this class. Here we give you an idea of how it compares with Honda CR-V and the Subaru Crosstrek.

Comparing Mazda CX-5 with other crossovers

  • Mazda CX-5 vs. Honda CR-V
    Both these models have undergone a complete redesign for 2017. They both offer comfortable head clearance and leg space. Honda CR-V has more cargo space. However, the interior of the Mazda CX-5 is almost luxury class now and the cabin is elegant. They both offer reliable performance. As for fuel economy, the CR-V comes with two CVT engines. The 2 .4-litre 4-cylinder engine that comes with the LX trim level and the 1.5-litre turbocharged 4-cylinder version on other trim levels both outperform many other cars in this class in four-wheel drive, while the AWD model is behind by just 1 mpg. In terms of driving experience, the Mazda CX-5 surges ahead, with a more natural response and quicker reactions from the 6-speed automatic transmission engine.
  • Mazda CX-5 vs. Subaru Crosstrek
    The Mazda CX-5 and the Subaru Crosstrek both offer similar levels of passenger comfort and fuel economy. In terms of cost, the Subaru Crosstrek is relatively affordable, with a lower MSRP and lower destination charge, which is the cost of transporting the vehicle to the dealer from the manufacturing facility. In terms of driving experience, the CX-5 is the winner. Both vehicles have the same seating capacity, while the cargo space is smaller in the Subaru Crosstrek. Mazda CX-5 has a higher towing capacity than the Crosstrek. They both come with a similar basic warranty.

Disclaimer:
The content provided on our blog site traverses numerous categories, offering readers valuable and practical information. Readers can use the editorial team’s research and data to gain more insights into their topics of interest. However, they are requested not to treat the articles as conclusive. The website team cannot be held responsible for differences in data or inaccuracies found across other platforms. Please also note that the site might also miss out on various schemes and offers available that the readers may find more beneficial than the ones we cover.
Previous Article
Next Article